ArticleiScience2026
Objective prenatal sleep and adverse childhood experiences in a proof-of-concept observational mixed methods study.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have been proposed as a contributor to maternal health risk, and sleep is one pathway through which early adversity may influence physiological functioning during pregnancy. We examined whether ACEs were associated with objectively measured sleep patterns in an observational study of 50 first-time pregnant adults who wore a physiological monitoring device continuously for 30 days during the second trimester. The wearable data provided nightly sleep stage estimates, heart rate, and physical activity. Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep duration emerged as the variable most strongly associated with ACE exposure. Participants with ACEs showed greater REM sleep duration and a larger increase in REM sleep across the monitoring period. Classification models using REM duration distinguished participants with and without ACEs with high accuracy (75.56%), and ACE was a significant predictor of REM duration in regression modeling. These findings suggest a physiological sleep signature linked to early adversity during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.