ReviewNursing research and practice2026
Exploring Communication Tools in Clinical Settings: Addressing the Need for a Universal Approach to Clinical Handover.
Review in Nursing research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring Communication Tools in Clinical Settings: Addressing the Need for a Universal Approach to Clinical Handover.Nursing research and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Effective communication in clinical handovers is critical for promoting patient safety and care quality. Healthcare professionals lack interprofessional training on clinical handovers. Aims: To identify educational strategies used to enhance clinical handover competence in clinical settings, map outcomes used to evaluate training effectiveness, and explore methods suitable for interprofessional education. Design: A scoping review guided by the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Methods: A systematic search of seven electronic databases was conducted. Results: Seventeen studies were included in this review, which yielded the following major themes: (1) education strategies were evidence-based program structured with communication frameworks; (2) diverse outcomes were measured in clinical handover training; (3) inadequacy in interprofessional training on clinical handovers. Training programs encompassed various learning activities to improve clinical handover practices. Few studies highlight effective training methods enhanced communication, confidence, and operational efficiency. Conclusions: There is a need for more robust, longitudinal, and randomized studies to evaluate long-term effects. Future research should expand interprofessional training, incorporate innovative technologies, and develop standardized curricula to better prepare healthcare professionals for effective clinical handovers. Results indicate that no single tool has been universally recommended. There remains a need to recommend a universal handover tool through interprofessional education and promote its use within diverse healthcare disciplines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.