ArticleACS materials Au2026
Valorization of Blueberry Processing Byproducts for the Development of Intelligent Packaging: A Comparative Study on Biomass versus Extract Use in pH-Sensitive Films.
Article in ACS materials Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physical-Chemical and Microbiological Characterisation of Blueberry By-Products (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The simultaneous challenges of plastic pollution and food waste call for sustainable materials that valorize agro-industrial residues. In this study, multifunctional chitosan-based films were developed by incorporating up to 30 wt % of mildly hydrolyzed blueberry pomace (BBP), a juice industry byproduct rich in anthocyanins and fibers. Unlike conventional approaches that rely on anthocyanin extracts, our full-biomass strategy integrates both soluble and insoluble pomace fractions directly into the chitosan matrix and benchmarks these against extract-only controls. The resulting films exhibited enhanced opacity, UV-blocking ability, and strong pH-responsive color changesattributes critical for intelligent food packaging. FTIR and SEM analyses confirmed strong interactions between BBP and chitosan, while mechanical tests revealed increased flexibility and moderate reinforcement from BBP fibers. Although both BBP and extract additions slightly reduced thermal stability and increased water solubility, they did not compromise barrier properties; BBP-loaded films maintained water vapor permeability, while extract-loaded films showed a minor increase. Importantly, BBP-containing films showed superior pH responsiveness and sustained antioxidant release over time, highlighting their multifunctionality. This work demonstrates a scalable, zero-waste packaging strategy aligned with circular economy principles through the upcycling of crustacean shell waste and fruit pomace into high-performance smart films.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.