ArticleJAR life2026
Adapting WHO integrated care for older people (ICOPE) models to the Korean context: Policy relevance and feasibility-a Delphi survey.
Article in JAR life, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current status and progress of validation studies on the ICOPE scale: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of the WHO ICOPE step 1 screening tool in Korean community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional validation study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Korea is projected to become a super-aged society by 2025, prompting the World Health Organization (WHO) to develop the Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) framework for person-centered, community-based care. Despite Korea's efforts in translating ICOPE materials and launching pilot projects, evidence on their national policy alignment and feasibility for scale-up remains limited. Objective: This study assesses the policy relevance and feasibility of implementing the ICOPE framework in Korea through expert consensus and structural comparison with ongoing national and local initiatives. Methods: A three-round Delphi survey involved 31 experts in geriatrics, public health, and aging policy. Thirty-two ICOPE implementation items were evaluated across micro, Results: Most ICOPE elements, particularly at the micro level (e.g., frailty screening in primary care: IQR = 0.93, CVR = 0.72), were deemed relevant and feasible. However, macro-level components like digital infrastructure and financing showed limited readiness. Conclusion: The ICOPE framework is broadly compatible with Korea's integrated care strategies, especially at the micro level. Macro-level implementation gaps persist. This study's findings, particularly identified consensus priorities and policy-practice gaps, aim to directly inform future policy design and scale-up strategies for integrated care in Korea, guiding efforts in governance integration, ICT infrastructure development, and indicator standardization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.