Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41551336›Full record

ArticleChina CDC weekly2026

Large Language Model-Based Text Recognition and Structured Data Extraction for Dietary Surveys.

Fangxu Guan, Ruixue Niu, Feifei Huang, Xiaofan Zhang, Yanli Wei, Jiguo Zhang, Xiaofang Jia, Yifei Ouyang, Jing Bai, Chang Su and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in China CDC weekly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Fangxu Guan *Key Laboratory of Public Nutrition and Health, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China; National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention & Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China.
Ruixue Niu *School of Software Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
Feifei HuangKey Laboratory of Public Nutrition and Health, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China; National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention & Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xiaofan ZhangKey Laboratory of Public Nutrition and Health, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China; National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention & Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yanli WeiKey Laboratory of Public Nutrition and Health, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China; National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention & Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jiguo ZhangKey Laboratory of Public Nutrition and Health, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China; National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention & Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xiaofang JiaKey Laboratory of Public Nutrition and Health, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China; National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention & Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yifei OuyangKey Laboratory of Public Nutrition and Health, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China; National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention & Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jing BaiKey Laboratory of Public Nutrition and Health, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China; National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention & Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China.
Chang SuKey Laboratory of Public Nutrition and Health, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China; National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention & Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China.
Li LiKey Laboratory of Public Nutrition and Health, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China; National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention & Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China.
Wenwen DuKey Laboratory of Public Nutrition and Health, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China; National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention & Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China.
Honglei LiuSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Huijun WangKey Laboratory of Public Nutrition and Health, National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China; National Institute for Nutrition and Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention & Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Traditional dietary surveys are time-consuming, and manual recording may lead to omissions. Improvement during data collection is essential to enhance accuracy of nutritional surveys. In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have been rapidly developed, which can provide text-processing functions and assist investigators in conducting dietary surveys. Methods: Thirty-eight participants from 15 families in the Huangpu and Jiading districts of Shanghai were selected. A standardized 24-hour dietary recall protocol was conducted using an intelligent recording pen that simultaneously captured audio data. These recordings were then transcribed into text. After preprocessing, we used GLM-4 for prompt engineering and chain-of-thought for collaborative reasoning, output structured data, and analyzed its integrity and consistency. Model performance was evaluated using precision and F1 scores. Results: The overall integrity rate of the LLM-based structured data reached 92.5%, and the overall consistency rate compared with manual recording was 86%. The LLM can accurately and completely recognize the names of ingredients and dining and production locations during the transcription. The LLM achieved 94% precision and an F1 score of 89.7% for the full dataset. Conclusion: LLM-based text recognition and structured data extraction can serve as effective auxiliary tools to improve efficiency and accuracy in traditional dietary surveys. With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence, more accurate and efficient auxiliary tools can be developed for more precise and efficient data collection in nutrition research.

Indexed as

cohort studydietary surveylarge language model

Identifiers

PMID41551336
PMCPMC12804767

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.