ArticleDigital health
Quality and content analysis of syphilis-related short videos on Douyin (TikTok): A cross-sectional study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Douyin (TikTok) has gradually emerged as an important channel through which the public obtains health information. This study aimed to evaluate the content, quality, and reliability of syphilis-related short videos on Douyin. Methods: We conducted two rounds of data collection on Douyin, extracting video duration, engagement metrics, uploader identity, and video content for syphilis-related videos. Video quality and reliability were assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN) tool. Correlation analyses were performed between video metrics and quality scores. Results: A total of 81 and 95 videos were included in the first and second rounds, respectively. Clinical manifestations were the most frequently discussed topic, whereas key information on diagnosis and prognosis was insufficiently covered. In the first round, the median GQS was 2.00 (IQR: 2.00-3.00), and the median mDISCERN score was 3.00 (IQR: 3.00-3.00). In the second round, the median GQS was 2.00 (IQR: 2.00-2.00), and the median mDISCERN score was 2.00 (IQR: 2.00-2.00). In both analyses, videos uploaded by healthcare professionals had higher GQS and mDISCERN scores than those uploaded by individual users ( Conclusions: The overall quality and reliability of syphilis-related videos on Douyin are suboptimal, and current content may not adequately meet public health information needs. Strengthening the involvement of healthcare professionals and improving content structure are essential to enhance the health education value of short video platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.