Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41551865›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2026

Temporal muscle measurements as predictor for outcome in a cohort of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients.

H Pinson, C De Rudder, L De Backer, A Van Sinay, T Boterberg, G Hallaert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

H PinsonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
C De RudderFaculty of Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
L De BackerFaculty of Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
A Van SinayFaculty of Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
T BoterbergFaculty of Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
G HallaertFaculty of Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Temporal muscle thickness has been suggested as an independent prognostic marker for glioblastoma patient outcome. Various cohort studies show however conflicting results. This study therefore aims to reevaluate the prognostic value of different types of temporal muscle measurements in glioblastoma patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed including 137 patients diagnosed with IDH-wildtype glioblastoma. Temporal muscle thickness (TMT) and volume (TMV) were measured on preoperative MR-imaging. Next, these measurements were used in a multivariate Cox survival analysis to identify their possible prognostic value. These results were compared to the literature after systematic review of the Medline database. Results: TMT has a moderate to strong linear correlation with total muscle volume (Pearson r = 0.6; P < 0.001). Glioblastoma patients "at risk for sarcopenia" show similar outcome compared to controls (median overall survival time: 13 months vs 11 months; P = 0.775). In a covariate Cox regression model, none of the temporal muscle measurements (TMT, TMV or sex-specific cut-off points) showed prognostic value for outcome in glioblastoma patients. Conclusion: Temporal muscle measurements show no independent relation to clinical outcome in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients. There seems adequate linear correlation of temporal muscle thickness and overall muscle volume. The literature on temporal muscle measurements lacks methodological consistency and should be interpreted with caution.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaSarcopeniaTemporal muscle thicknessTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID41551865
PMCPMC12805028

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.