ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Students' stress prediction and explainable analysis based on improved decision trees.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nowadays students are burdened with pressures from various aspects such as academics, social life, and career planning. It is of great significance to accurately predict their stress levels and analyze the key influencing factors. Methods: A stress prediction model for students was constructed based on an enhanced decision tree (DT) algorithm. First, nine machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression (LR) and DT, were compared to screen out the optimal base model. Then, the harris hawks optimization (HHO) algorithm was introduced to optimize the DT model and improve its prediction performance. Finally, the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) model was applied to interpret the prediction results and analyze the contribution of various features to stress levels. Results: The DT algorithm showed outstanding performance among the nine compared models, achieving a prediction accuracy of 0.909. After optimization by the HHO algorithm, the HHO-DT model further improved the accuracy to 0.927 and had the fewest misclassified samples. SHAP analysis revealed that blood pressure, social support, and depression were the key features affecting students' stress level prediction. Discussion: The research results provide a scientific and effective basis for intervention measures taken by mental health educators, parents, and students themselves, which is helpful to relieve students' stress and promote their physical and mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.