Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41551956›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Students' stress prediction and explainable analysis based on improved decision trees.

Cheng Liu, Shuang Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cheng LiuDepartment of Digital Business, Jiangsu Vocational Institute of Commerce, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Shuang YuDepartment of Digital Business, Jiangsu Vocational Institute of Commerce, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Nowadays students are burdened with pressures from various aspects such as academics, social life, and career planning. It is of great significance to accurately predict their stress levels and analyze the key influencing factors. Methods: A stress prediction model for students was constructed based on an enhanced decision tree (DT) algorithm. First, nine machine learning algorithms, including logistic regression (LR) and DT, were compared to screen out the optimal base model. Then, the harris hawks optimization (HHO) algorithm was introduced to optimize the DT model and improve its prediction performance. Finally, the Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) model was applied to interpret the prediction results and analyze the contribution of various features to stress levels. Results: The DT algorithm showed outstanding performance among the nine compared models, achieving a prediction accuracy of 0.909. After optimization by the HHO algorithm, the HHO-DT model further improved the accuracy to 0.927 and had the fewest misclassified samples. SHAP analysis revealed that blood pressure, social support, and depression were the key features affecting students' stress level prediction. Discussion: The research results provide a scientific and effective basis for intervention measures taken by mental health educators, parents, and students themselves, which is helpful to relieve students' stress and promote their physical and mental health.

Indexed as

decision tree algorithmharris hawks optimizationmachine learningSHAP modelstudent stress prediction

Identifiers

PMID41551956
PMCPMC12808363

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.