ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026
Operationalising social transition in trans and gender diverse youth: a scoping review of definitions and measures.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trajectories of social transition among trans children and adolescents in Victoria, Australia: a longitudinal descriptive study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Social transition can be an important and accessible aspect of gender affirmation, allowing trans and gender diverse young people to authentically express their identities, including through adoption of chosen name, pronouns, and changes to appearance. These changes may take place in a single context, such as at home, or across multiple settings, including school, with friends, and online. Currently, it is unclear how this process is being captured in the literature, including whether it has been measured comprehensively and consistently. Methods: This scoping review (PROSPERO: CRD42022333058) explored how social transition has been defined and operationalised in studies involving trans young people (under 18), detailing practices (i.e. specific changes) of social transition and contexts where these changes occurred. Systematic searches were conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycInfo databases to August 2025. Studies were eligible if they included a definition and/or measure of social transition. Findings: Among 40 included studies, definitions (n = 37 studies) and measures (n = 29 studies) varied widely. Some studies did not distinguish between specific practices of social transition, such as changes to name, pronouns, or appearance, when defining (4/37) and measuring (6/29) the construct. However, many studies omitted reference to the contexts in which these practices occurred (19/37 definitions; 14/29 measures), assuming practices took place uniformly across all contexts. Many also relied on a binary measure of social transition (15/29 measures), failing to capture the diverse ways in which individuals enact their social transition. No measurement tools were used consistently. Interpretation: Current definitions and measures of social transition in research with trans and gender diverse young people are inconsistent and incomplete. As a result, they fail to capture the complex nature of social transition, limiting comparability between studies and hindering understanding of its complexities and impacts. Comprehensive, standardised measures to capture this concept are urgently required. Funding: There was no funding source for this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.