ArticleCureus2025
Comparison of Lockdown Practices and COVID-19 Beliefs Among Public-Facing Bankers and Work-From-Home Teachers.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCOVID-19 was declared a global pandemic in March 2020. During this time of emergency and because of the novel and poorly understood nature of this virus, misinformation was spreading side by side, worsening people's fears. This was why conducting this study was so important, to discover the knowledge gap regarding COVID-19 spread, cure, and preventative measures.
objectivesThis study aims to investigate and compare the daily habits and beliefs about COVID-19 transmission and treatment among two groups during the lockdown period. Additionally, it seeks to examine how watching an educational video influences their opinions and attitudes toward COVID-19.
methodsA quasi-experimental pre- and post-intervention study was conducted from September 2021 to January 2022 among bankers (public dealers) and teachers (work-from-home individuals). The questionnaire covered demographics, daily routines, COVID-19 knowledge, thoughts on lockdown, and vaccine beliefs. After completing the survey, participants watched a video on COVID-19 and completed the same survey again a week later.
resultOur study revealed a notable impact of the intervention on participants' behaviors and beliefs. The study showed a mixed impact, while there was a significant increase in mask-changing habits; surprisingly, attendance at mass events also rose. Teachers demonstrated improved hand hygiene practices, with a notable increase in frequency. Bankers showed a significant increase in adopting preventative measures, including social distancing and changing clothes after returning home. Additionally, a greater number of bankers recognized the ineffectiveness of senna or antibiotics in treating COVID-19. Overall, the intervention had a more pronounced effect on the teachers' practices and bankers' beliefs.
conclusionPublic dealers and work-from-home individuals share similar cleanliness habits. Our video intervention boosted mask-wearing, a key COVID-19 preventive measure. Bankers showed the most notable changes in beliefs and practices, suggesting a greater impact. Further studies in other regions and professions are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.