ReviewCureus2025
Cardiovascular Effects of Testosterone Replacement Therapy in Hypogonadal Men: A Systematic Review of Lipid Profiles, Inflammatory Markers, and Vascular Function.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circulating Markers of Cardiovascular Health in Hypogonadism Before and After Testosterone Therapy: Molecular Aspects and Formulation Comparison.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Comment on: cardiovascular and prostate cancer risk associated to testosterone replacement therapy-a systematic review and meta-analysis of 41 randomized controlled trials.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) is commonly used to treat men with hypogonadism in order to replace the physiological levels of testosterone, although the cardiovascular safety and metabolic advantages of this treatment are still controversial. This article is a systematic review of the existing literature on the cardiovascular impact of TRT on lipid levels, inflammatory parameters, as well as endothelial activity in hypogonadal men. This systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar of peer-reviewed studies that were published between 2005 and 2025. The Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R-AMSTAR) tool was used to evaluate methodological quality, and the data were synthesized narratively due to substantial heterogeneity across study designs, including differences in TRT formulations, dosing regimens, treatment duration, and the clinical characteristics of hypogonadal populations. Quality ratings were considered when interpreting the evidence, with higher-quality studies providing stronger support for the cardiovascular effects of TRT. In this review, 25 studies were included as they met the inclusion criteria. The included studies comprised randomized controlled trials and observational research designs (systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and cohort studies). Overall, TRT was associated with reductions in total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), while high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) showed modest increases or remained stable across studies. Anti-inflammatory effects of testosterone therapy were demonstrated by the decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)) and the enhancement of endothelial-dependent vasodilation. In hypogonadal men, TRT shows some improvements in endothelial function and reduced systemic inflammation, with benefits most evident under physiological dosing, while its lipid effects may be generally neutral to mildly favorable (decrease in TC/LDL, HDL often somewhat decreased depending on formulation). Long-term cardiovascular safety appears generally reassuring with respect to major adverse cardiac events in appropriately selected patients, though some adverse events may warrant monitoring. High-quality, longer-duration trials remain needed to strengthen these conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.