ReviewCureus2025
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS): Transforming Orthopedic Trauma Management.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The efficacy of ERAS-related components in orthopedic trauma surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Pooled it
- Enhanced recovery after surgery principles in pediatric fractures and sports injuries: strategies, technologies, and outcomes.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols represent a paradigm shift in perioperative care, emphasizing evidence-based multidisciplinary approaches to optimize surgical outcomes. This narrative review examines the current evidence for ERAS implementation in orthopedic trauma care by synthesizing literature from major medical databases. The ERAS protocols in patients with hip fractures demonstrate robust evidence for improved outcomes, including reduced hospital length of stay, decreased complication rates, lower delirium and infection rates, and improved pain control with reduced opioid consumption. Emerging evidence for ankle and other extremity fractures shows similar benefits, including a faster return to function and improved patient satisfaction. The key ERAS components include preoperative optimization, intraoperative stress reduction, and aggressive postoperative mobilization. Despite compelling evidence, implementation remains challenging because of resource limitations, knowledge gaps, organizational barriers, and the unpredictable nature of trauma care. Successful ERAS programs require dedicated multidisciplinary teams, institutional commitment, clear protocols, ongoing education, and robust measurement systems. As the evidence base expands and implementation science advances, ERAS has the potential to become the standard of care for trauma patients worldwide, with future directions including technology integration, precision medicine approaches, and adaptation to resource-limited settings to further enhance the reach and effectiveness of these protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.