ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
Impact of early coronary angiography on short-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a retrospective study.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the impact of early coronary angiography on clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
methodsThis retrospective study included 221 AMI patients admitted to Zhangye People's Hospital Affiliated to Hexi University from December 2020 to December 2024. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received early coronary angiography or not: the non-early coronary angiography group (n=95) and the early coronary angiography group (n=126). Early coronary angiography was defined as within 120 minutes of admission. Baseline characteristics, in-hospital outcomes, echocardiogram indicators, and 6-month follow-up data were compared between the two groups.
resultsCompared with the non-early coronary angiography group, the early coronary angiography group demonstrated significantly lower incidences of target lesion revascularization (11.90% vs. 24.21%), left ventricle thrombosis (8.73% vs. 18.95%), major bleeding (11.11% vs. 22.11%), and cardiogenic shock (8.73% vs. 18.95%) during hospitalization (all P<0.05). The average hospital stay in the early angiography group was shorter (7.95 ± 1.92 days vs. 8.76 ± 2.27 days, P=0.005), and the readmission rate was also lower (18.25% vs. 35.79%, P=0.003) compared with the non-early coronary angiography group. During the 6-month follow-up, the early angiography group continued to exhibit significantly lower rates of percutaneous coronary intervention (0.00% vs. 6.32%), coronary artery bypass grafting (3.17% vs. 11.58%), and angina incidence (3.97% vs. 12.63%) (all P<0.05).
conclusionsEarly coronary angiography may help improve the in-hospital outcomes and 6-month follow-up outcomes in patients with AMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.