ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
A cost-effectiveness analysis of baloxavir marboxil versus oseltamivir for seasonal influenza treatment in China.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of baloxavir marboxil versus oseltamivir for treating seasonal influenza among both high-risk and otherwise healthy populations in China from the healthcare system perspective. Methods: A decision tree model was constructed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of two drugs. This model was integrated with a transmission dynamics model to assess the impact on controlling influenza spread. Model parameters for epidemiology, costs, and utilities were derived from real-world data on treatment costs from secondary and tertiary hospitals across China, the phase III clinical trial of baloxavir (CAPSTONE), and published literature. Results: Baloxavir was found to be a dominant strategy compared to oseltamivir in both populations, yielding lower costs and higher QALYs. For the high-risk population, baloxavir treatment would save $2.5468 per patient and gain an additional 0.00018 QALYs. In addition, for the otherwise healthy population, it would save $1.1278 per patient and gain an additional 0.00024 QALYs. One-way sensitivity analysis identified QALYs for influenza and hospitalization costs as the most influential parameters for the high-risk population, whereas the number of infections, ICU fatality rate, and hospitalization costs were key drivers for the otherwise healthy population. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these findings. Conclusion: Baloxavir is a cost-effective alternative to oseltamivir for seasonal influenza treatment in China. It can improve patient outcomes and reduce influenza transmission at a societal level, offering value to the healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.