Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41553008›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2026

Contextualizing key principles to promote a justice-oriented informatics research agenda: proceedings and reflections from an American Medical Informatics Association workshop.

Aparajita Kashyap, Christopher J Allsman, Elizabeth A Campbell, Pooja M Desai, Salvatore G Volpe, Bria P Massey, Tiffani J Bright, Suzanne Bakken, Oliver J Bear Don't Walk Iv, Adrienne Pichon

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aparajita KashyapDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5660-2778
Christopher J AllsmanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Elizabeth A CampbellDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Pooja M DesaiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4510-4896
Salvatore G VolpeCollege of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY 11203, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7273-0841
Bria P MasseyCenter for Population Health IT, Department of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, United States.
Tiffani J BrightDepartment of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0894-0107
Suzanne BakkenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6202-6001
Oliver J Bear Don't Walk IvDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4310-9279
Adrienne PichonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9393-3410

Funding

Training in Biomedical Informatics at Columbia UniversityT15LM007079 · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · 1992 to 2025
$8.3M
Collaboratively Identifying Population-Specific Social Determinants of Health for Indigenous Patients Living with HIV: From Patient Perspectives to the Electronic Health RecordK99LM014579 · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · 2025 to 2025
$88k
National Human Genome Research Institute of the National Institutes of Health R35HG011319NHGRI NIH HHSNIH HHS R35HG011319NLM NIH HHS K99 LM014579NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007079NLM NIH HHS T15LM007079Precision health & genomics: Indigenous Mentoring & EthicsPrecision health & genomics: Indigenous Mentoring & Ethics (PrIME) program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAdvancing health through informatics requires attending to justice. Recent policy changes in the United States have introduced significant barriers to promoting justice within informatics due to targeted funding cuts and hostility to science, especially science that prioritizes justice. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe present five key principles for advancing a justice-oriented informatics agenda, synthesized from our workshop held at the American Medical Informatics Association 2022 Annual Symposium.

resultsThese principles are: (1) Recognize knowledge and methodologies across communities; (2) Acknowledge historical and cultural contexts of interactions; (3) Facilitate transparency and accountability through clear measures and metrics; (4) Foster trust and sustainability; and (5) Equitably allocate compensation and resources. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionWe discuss barriers to implementing these principles that have arisen since the 2022 workshop and provide recommendations for moving towards justice-oriented informatics. We offer examples of how these principles may be used to frame challenges and adapt to new barriers within BMI.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchMedical InformaticsSocial JusticeHumansUnited Statescommunity participationethicsinformaticsjusticeleadership

Identifiers

PMID41553008
PMCPMC13089401

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.