ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026
Artificial intelligence analysis of minimally invasive surgery data.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence applications in surgical education and training: a systematic review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Intelligent therapeutic robotic-assisted surgery as the next frontier of precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To synthesize the expanding literature at the intersection of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and artificial intelligence (AI) and to delineate the developmental patterns that are shaping the future surgical landscape. A narrative review of current evidence examining the integration of AI into MIS was conducted, focusing on technological evolution, the use of high-dimensional surgical data streams, and the emergence of multimodal datasets combining surgical images, real-time kinematics, and live video feed. The literature demonstrates a clear shift from traditional machine-learning algorithms to advanced deep-learning architectures capable of processing big data without latency. Multimodal datasets are increasingly enabling the creation of smart surgical environments with high-fidelity context awareness. As a result, AI systems are evolving from passive observers to explainable digital assistants capable of identifying anatomical structures, predicting surgical phases, providing real-time guidance, and supporting surgical education through objective, data-driven assessments that reduce the learning curve for novice surgeons. However, current models remain largely confined to experimental “sandbox” settings due to substantial ethical, regulatory, and safety constraints. AI is becoming an integral component of modern MIS, with the potential to augment surgeon performance and enhance surgical training. Yet, meaningful clinical integration will require addressing the ethical, regulatory, and safety challenges that currently limit translation from experimental environments to real-world practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41553446What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.