Evidence mapPaperPMID 41553446Full record

ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026

Artificial intelligence analysis of minimally invasive surgery data.

Stefanos P Raptis, Achilleas Theocharopoulos, Charalampos Theocharopoulos, Stavros P Papadakos, Georgios Levantis, Elissaios Kontis, Aristidis G Vrahatis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stefanos P RaptisDepartment of Informatics, Ionian University, Corfu, Greece. sraptis@ionio.gr.
Achilleas TheocharopoulosDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National and Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Charalampos TheocharopoulosDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Stavros P PapadakosDepartment of Gastroenterology, Laiko General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Georgios LevantisProgramme Committee for the Biomedicine Programmes, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Elissaios KontisDepartment of Surgery, Metaxa Cancer Hospital, Piraeus, Greece.
Aristidis G VrahatisDepartment of Informatics, Ionian University, Corfu, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To synthesize the expanding literature at the intersection of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and artificial intelligence (AI) and to delineate the developmental patterns that are shaping the future surgical landscape. A narrative review of current evidence examining the integration of AI into MIS was conducted, focusing on technological evolution, the use of high-dimensional surgical data streams, and the emergence of multimodal datasets combining surgical images, real-time kinematics, and live video feed. The literature demonstrates a clear shift from traditional machine-learning algorithms to advanced deep-learning architectures capable of processing big data without latency. Multimodal datasets are increasingly enabling the creation of smart surgical environments with high-fidelity context awareness. As a result, AI systems are evolving from passive observers to explainable digital assistants capable of identifying anatomical structures, predicting surgical phases, providing real-time guidance, and supporting surgical education through objective, data-driven assessments that reduce the learning curve for novice surgeons. However, current models remain largely confined to experimental “sandbox” settings due to substantial ethical, regulatory, and safety constraints. AI is becoming an integral component of modern MIS, with the potential to augment surgeon performance and enhance surgical training. Yet, meaningful clinical integration will require addressing the ethical, regulatory, and safety challenges that currently limit translation from experimental environments to real-world practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresHumansIntelligent SystemsMachine LearningSoft ComputingArtificial intelligenceComputer-assisted surgeryDeep learningMachine learningMinimally invasive surgery

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.