Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41553454›Full record

ArticleBotanical studies2026

Integrative taxonomic revision of three Camellia species from section Tuberculata (Camellia, Theaceae) by morphological, anatomical, palynological, and molecular evidence.

Weihao Gu, Mingtai An, Chao Yan, Xu Xiao, Zhaohui Ran, Zhi Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Botanical studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Weihao GuCollege of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Mingtai AnCollege of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Chao YanCollege of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Xu XiaoCollege of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Zhaohui RanCollege of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China.
Zhi LiCollege of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, China. zli7@gzu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7094-1672

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32400179the 2024 Guizhou Science and Technology Innovation Talent Team Construction Project: Wildlife Innovation Team of the Forestry college of Guizhou University Qian ke he ren cai CXTD [2025] 053
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe section Tuberculata (Camellia L.) comprises 18 species, forming a monophyletic group with unique “tuberculate-wrinkled fruit pericarp” morphological characteristics. However, the interspecific relationships within this section remain poorly resolved. A notable taxonomic controversy involves Camellia lipingensis, C. zengii, and C. rhytidocarpa, which were previously considered conspecific. On the basis of extensive population surveys conducted in their type localities, we identified significant morphological disparities among these three taxa. To comprehensively clarify their taxonomic status and relationships, we conducted an integrated study incorporating morphology, micromorphology (leaf epidermis and pollen), and molecular systematics (cpDNA and nrDNA ITS).

resultsEvidence from morphology, anatomy, palynology, and molecular systematics consistently supports the treatment of Camellia zengii as a heterotypic synonym of C. lipingensis, while confirming the distinct species status of C. rhytidocarpa. Morphological analysis revealed continuous variation in key traits: Leaves lanceolate (6.42–12.50 × 2.16–4.45 cm); floral parts with 6–9 rounded sepals, 3–5 hairy styles, and 2.2–4.1 cm long filaments; fruit subglobose (diameter 2.24–3.18 cm), ovary 3-4-loculed (1 seed per locule). Anatomical and pollen characteristics are conservative: The leaf epidermal stomata are elliptical (39.9–41.2 × 31.4–36.7 μm), with a density of 62–86 per mm², and the pollen is nearly spherical (polar axis 36.7–37.8 μm/equatorial axis 40.3–41.3 μm, P/E ratio 0.87–0.91). Molecular phylogenetic analyses confirmed that Camellia lipingensis and Camellia zengii form a strongly supported monophyletic group (ML/PP = 100/1.00; clade Ⅰ), with Camellia rhytidocarpa forming a separate clade sister to it. The chloroplast genomes of the three taxa are conserved in structure, with consistent chloroplast genome structures (157,029, 157,029, 157,048 bp; GC 37.3%; containing 87 protein-coding genes, 37 tRNA genes, and 8 rRNA genes).

conclusionsThis study conclusively resolved the taxonomic delimitation among these closely related species within sect. Tuberculata. We propose the synonymization of Camellia zengii with C. lipingensis and confirm that C. rhytidocarpa is a distinct species, a conclusion robustly supported by congruent evidence from multiple disciplines. Our research provides a practical framework for reconstructing phylogenies in morphologically complex plant groups, informs conservation prioritization, and contributes to the development of standardized species delimitation protocols.

Indexed as

Complex speciesIntegrative taxonomySection TuberculataSpecies delimitationTaxonomic revision

Identifiers

PMID41553454
PMCPMC12816479

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.