ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2026
Systematic analysis of the adverse effects of used clinical antisense oligonucleotide drugs in DMD patients based on the FAERS database.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDuchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked recessive neuromuscular disorder. Building on advancements in oligonucleotide chemistry and delivery, antisense oligonucleotides have emerged as a clinically approved therapeutic modality for treating Duchenne muscular dystrophy. However, the safety assessment of these drugs in clinical application remains limited.
methodsThis study utilized the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System to collect reports of adverse events related to four ASOs: Casimersen, Eteplirsen, Golodirsen, and Viltolarsen. The following four algorithms were used to quantify the adverse event (AE) signals: the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Multi-item Gamma-Poisson Shrinker (MGPS) models with Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean (EBGM) estimation.
resultsAmong 2,760 reports, the predominant AEs included respiratory infections, injection-site reactions, and systemic symptoms. A high reporting odds ratio was observed for poor venous access and product dose omission (Golodirsen, Eteplirsen, Casimersen). Proteinuria was reported for three ASOs (Viltolarsen, Eteplirsen, Casimersen). Among them, Viltolarsen exhibited the most potent signals (ROR = 55.41). Most AEs occurred more than 60 days post-dose (47–53%).
conclusionsThis study confirms the overall safety of four ASO drugs in line with previous publications. The adverse events, such as proteinuria, heart failure, and respiratory failure, highlight the importance of multidisciplinary management. However, limitations inherent to the FAERS database preclude the definitive establishment of causality and the accurate determination of incidence rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41553486What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.