ArticleJournal of molecular histology2026
Berberine and N-Acetylcysteine ameliorate diabetes-induced hippocampal damage by inhibiting apoptosis and neuroinflammation, and improve synaptic plasticity in rats.
Article in Journal of molecular histology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disease characterized by hyperglycemia resulting from impaired insulin secretion and resistance. Berberine (BBR) and N-acetylcysteine are anti-inflammatory and antiapoptotic compounds that have beneficial effects on diabetic complications. This study aimed to investigate the effects of BBR and NAC on the Hippocampus in an experimental diabetes model in rats. Rats were divided into 5 groups: control, diabetes (D), D + NAC, D + BBR, and D + BBR + NAC. STZ (45 mg/kg, i.p.) was administered to the other four groups except the control group. BBR and NAC (50 mg/kg/day) were given intragastrically (i.g.) to the treatment groups for 28 days. Decreased cell body size, pyknotic cells and necrotic neurons were observed in the D group. However, these pathological changes were largely improved in the D + BBR, D + NAC, and D + BBR + NAC. Stereologically, there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of hippocampus volume. The number of pyramidal neurons in CA1 was significantly decreased in the D group. But the number of CA1 pyramidal neurons was higher in both the alone and combined BBR and NAC treatment groups than in the D group. Expressions of Caspase-3, TNF-α, and IL-1β increased in the D group, while expressions of Bcl-2 and SYP decreased. But, BBR and NAC treatments decreased Caspase-3, TNF-α, and IL-1β expressions and increased Bcl-2 and SYP expressions. These results revealed that BBR and NAC can have an antidiabetic effect against the neuronal damage caused by diabetes in the hippocampus CA1 region, suppressing inflammation and apoptosis and preventing the decrease in the number of pyramidal neurons. Also, they reveal that they may modulate synaptic plasticity by increasing synaptophysin expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41553565What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.