ArticleNeuroinformatics2026
Deep Learning-Based Classification of Temporal Stages of AT8-Labeled Tau Pathology After Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tauopathies are characterised by a progressive accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau. However, early and intermediate stages remain challenging to quantify due to subtle and heterogeneous morphological characteristics. This study evaluates a deep learning framework for classifying multiple temporal stages of tauopathy progression using AT8 (anti-phospho-tau antibody)-stained cortical micrographs in a controlled traumatic brain injury mouse model - an underexplored application. Three convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures were examined: a custom CNN and two transfer-learning models (InceptionV3 and DenseNet). Images were grouped into four post-injury stages: 1 day, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months. Preprocessing included normalisation, augmentation and oversampling to address imbalance. Performance was assessed using stratified k-fold cross-validation with accuracy, macro-F1, per-class F1, and one-vs-rest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). DenseNet achieved the best overall performance (accuracy = 70.9%, macro-F1 = 0.68) with strong discrimination for the 1-week stage (F1 = 0.95). All models showed limited separability in the earliest post-injury stage (1 day), while intermediate to late stages (1-3 months) exhibited partial overlap, consistent with the progressive nature of tau accumulation. These results indicate that deep learning, particularly transfer learning, offers a scalable approach for automated temporal staging of tauopathy in preclinical histology. Although the results are based on internal cross-validation without independent animal-level identifiers or external cohorts, the proposed framework provides a reliable foundation for incorporating CNN-based analysis into digital neuropathology workflows. Larger multi-centre datasets and slide-level modelling will be required to assess generalisation and support applications in early detection, longitudinal tracking, and treatment evaluation of tau-related neurodegeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.