ArticleDermatology and therapy2026
Lebrikizumab Improves Clinical Manifestations, Symptoms, and Quality of Life in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Previously Treated with Dupilumab: Results from the ADapt Study.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05369403 (An Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Lebrikizumab in Adult and Adolescent Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Previously Treated With Dupilumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Lebrikizumab in Adult and Adolescent Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Previously Treated With Dupilumab
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Switching from Dupilumab to Upadacitinib in Adults and Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis After Inadequate Response to Dupilumab: Efficacy and Safety Results from Period 2 of Phase 3b/4 Study (LEVEL UP).American journal of clinical dermatology · 2026Trial
- Treatment Outcomes of Lebrikizumab after Switching from Dupilumab in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis involving the Head and Neck Area.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Atopic Dermatitis Beyond the Skin Barrier: Precision Medicine Approaches to Immunological Profiling and Therapeutic Innovation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Targeting type 2 inflammation in dermatology: mechanisms and clinical implications.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Lebrikizumab for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Atopic Eczema: Real-World Experience from a Tertiary Centre.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Biologic Therapies Targeting Type 2 Signaling in Atopic Dermatitis: A Comparative Review of Structural and Thermodynamic Differences in Mechanism of Action.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2025Review
- An Overview of Atopic Dermatitis Disease Burden, Pathogenesis, and the Current Treatment Landscape: Recommendations for Appropriate Utilization of Systemic Therapies.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who discontinue dupilumab need additional therapeutic options. Lebrikizumab's distinct mechanism of action may provide that alternative treatment. We evaluated efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD previously treated with dupilumab.
methodsIn the open-label ADapt trial, patients who discontinued dupilumab due to inadequate response, adverse events (AEs)/intolerance, or other reasons received lebrikizumab 250-mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) following 500-mg loading dose at baseline/week 2, through week 16, with optional topical therapy. From weeks 16-24, responders (≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI 75] or Investigator's Global Assessment score 0/1 with ≥ 2-point improvement from baseline) received lebrikizumab every 4 weeks; inadequate responders continued lebrikizumab Q2W. The primary endpoint was EASI 75 at week 16 in the intent-to-treat population; EASI 75 was also analyzed by reason for dupilumab discontinuation. Secondary and exploratory efficacy endpoints were assessed throughout.
resultsAmong the 86 patients enrolled, primary reasons for stopping dupilumab were inadequate response (n = 48, 55.8%), AEs/intolerance (n = 14, 16.3%), and other reasons (n = 24, 27.9%). Fifty-nine patients (68.6%) completed week 16; 52 patients (60.5%) completed week 24. At weeks 16 and 24, respectively, response rates were 57.4% (35/61) and 60.0% (33/55) for EASI 75; 53.2% (25/47) and 61.5% (24/39) for Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale ≥ 4-point improvement; and 83.0% (44/53) and 83.0% (39/47) for Dermatology Life Quality Index ≥ 4-point improvement. Most treatment-emergent AEs were mild/moderate. Serious AEs and discontinuations due to AEs were reported by 2 (2.3%) and 5 (5.8%) patients, respectively. Of the 10 patients who discontinued dupilumab due to eye-related events, facial dermatitis, or inflammatory arthritis, none reported similar events with lebrikizumab.
conclusionResults suggest that lebrikizumab provides meaningful improvements in skin clearance, itch, and quality of life in dupilumab-experienced patients with moderate-to-severe AD, with a safety profile consistent with other lebrikizumab phase 3 trials.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05369403.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.