ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
How do we choose the optimal length of flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths (FANS): an EAU endourology and AUSET prospective multicenter analysis.
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate how to assess the optimal length of flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths (FANS) to be used during flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) for kidney stones.
methodsA prospective multicenter study (16 centers, July 2024–January 2025) enrolled 226 adults with normal renal anatomy undergoing FURS with FANS for renal stones. Three preoperative measurements were analyzed: (1) Subjective on X-ray: T12–pubic symphysis, (2) Objective on CT: upper pole–pubic symphysis, and (3) Dynamic ureteral catheter length with retrograde pyelogram (RPG): upper pole–urethral meatus. Sheath length appropriateness (too short/correct/too long) was assessed intraoperatively using predefined criteria (complete calyceal access, ergonomics, need for ancillary techniques). Secondary outcomes included 30-day stone-free rates (SFR) and complications.
resultsSheath length was deemed correct in 63.7%, too short in 9.7%, and too long in 26.5% of cases. For both genders, dynamic measurement of ureteric catheter length from upper pole calyx to 5 cm beyond the urethral meatus demonstrated the strongest correlation with optimal length (R = 0.7). Gender-specific formulas for optimal FANS length were derived: Male: 0.52 × ureteral catheter length + 26 cm. Female: 1.2 × ureteral catheter length − 2.1 cm. Compensatory techniques for length discrepancies included assistant-held stabilization of FANS (28.3%) and telescoping of penis (3.5%). 96% of sheaths accessed all calyces. The 30-day SFR was 92.5% (Grade A: 79.2% zero fragments; Grade B: 13.3% fragments ≤ 2 mm). Complications were low: sepsis not requiring ICU admission (0.4%) and ureteric stricture (0.6%). Only 2.7% patients were planned for reintervention.
conclusionThe selection of an optimal FANS length is critical for optimizing outcomes in FURS. Dynamic RPG-ureteral catheter length measurement best predicts this, enabling gender-specific formulas for easy estimation. Our results provide valuable insights into the clinical relevance of preoperative measurements, intraoperative adjustments, and the impact of sheath length on procedural success and complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.