ReviewDiabetologia2026
Fully closed-loop systems: can people with type 1 diabetes just do it? Insights from open-source systems.
Review in Diabetologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Tirzepatide in Type 1 Diabetes and Obesity: Impact on Glycaemia, Weight, and Cardiometabolic Risk Markers.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Advances in diabetes technology: clinical implications, limitations, and future perspectives.Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have significantly advanced diabetes management, progressively reducing user interactions required for optimal glucose management. This review evaluates the current landscape and future potential of AID systems without meal announcement, particularly focusing on real-world insights from open-source AID (OS-AID) technologies. Although commercial AID systems operating in hybrid closed-loop (HCL) mode have improved glycaemic outcomes, they remain dependent on manual meal announcement and user-driven actions, limiting their real-world utility. Current versions of OS-AID systems, developed by the diabetes community, can allow operation without meal announcements, presenting an opportunity to move closer to truly automated diabetes management. Recent clinical trials suggest that OS-AID systems can effectively manage glucose levels without meal announcements, achieving glucose levels comparable with those obtained by AID systems in HCL mode, with the potential of reduced management burden for users. However, practical challenges persist, including the need for expert configuration and handling of rapid changes in insulin sensitivity, such as during exercise or rapid glucose fluctuations following predicted low-glucose. This review synthesises insights from user and healthcare professional experiences, and emerging clinical evidence. It highlights the fact that successful implementation of AID without meal announcement requires advanced algorithmic responsiveness, user personalisation and ongoing clinician engagement. Looking forward, integrating adjunctive therapies, artificial intelligence and enhanced physiological modelling will likely enhance system performance to drive the next generation of diabetes care towards wider adoption and true 'set-and-forget' functionality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.