Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41555414›Full record

ReviewJournal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care2026

Artificial intelligence for early diagnosis in emergency department.

Nicola Di Fazio, Christian Zanza, Yaroslava Longhitano, Antonio Voza, Roberto Balagna, Sabino Mosca, Pietro Balagna, Riccardo Rossignoli, Sara Cerenzia, Giuseppe Bertozzi and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nicola Di FazioDepartment of Life Sciences, Health and Health Professions, Link Campus University, Rome, 00165, Italy.
Christian ZanzaDepartment of Systems Medicine, Geriatric Medicine Residency Program, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Rome, Italy.
Yaroslava LonghitanoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Antonio VozaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Humanitas University-Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
Roberto BalagnaDivision of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Giovanni Bosco, ASL, City of Turin, Italy. agemeuc@gmail.com.
Sabino MoscaDivision of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, San Giovanni Bosco, ASL, City of Turin, Italy.
Pietro BalagnaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Città Della Salute E Della Scienza of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Riccardo RossignoliDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, 00185, Italy.
Sara CerenziaSIC Medicina Legale Basilicata, Via Potito Petrone, Potenza, 85100, Italy.
Giuseppe BertozziSIC Medicina Legale Basilicata, Via Potito Petrone, Potenza, 85100, Italy.
Aniello MaieseDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, 00185, Italy.
Paola FratiDepartment of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, 00185, Italy.
Raffaele La RussaDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Public Health, Life and Environment Science, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, 67100, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has become an increasingly prominent player in emergency medicine, offering innovative tools to enhance the early diagnosis of acute conditions. This systematic review explores how AI, particularly through machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), is transforming the way physicians and healthcare professionals respond to high-stakes clinical scenarios. The evidence gathered shows that smart algorithms are capable of detecting complex patterns in clinical, diagnostic, and laboratory data, patterns that may even elude expert clinicians, especially under the high-pressure environment of the emergency room. From acute coronary syndrome to stroke, from sepsis to respiratory failure, AI has demonstrated impressive predictive power and provides real, practical support in risk stratification, triage optimization, and faster diagnosis. Equally important is its role in automated medical image analysis, which enables quicker and more accurate diagnostic decisions, offering real-time support for clinicians. However, the widespread adoption of these technologies also brings significant challenges: the need for algorithmic transparency, the necessity of earning the trust of healthcare providers, and the sensitive ethical issues related to patient data privacy. To overcome these barriers, it is essential to involve healthcare professionals in the development and implementation of AI technologies-ensuring their clinical expertise complements the analytical power of these new tools. Targeted training programs and large-scale validation studies are critical steps for ensuring the safe and effective use of AI. Ultimately, this review confirms that AI holds great promise as a catalyst for a more efficient, timely, and patient-centered approach to emergency medicine.

Indexed as

Acute diseasesAIArtificial intelligenceEarly diagnosisEmergency departmentMachine learningML

Identifiers

PMID41555414
PMCPMC12814581

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.