ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2026
Characterizing the molecular and clinical implications of NRG1 fusions in NSCLC through integrated RNA and DNA sequencing analysis.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- NRG1 fusions in non-small cell lung cancer: biology, diagnostics, and emerging HER2/HER3 therapies-a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- The Waiting Game: How NGS and Guideline-Concordant-Care Timing Shape Survival in Advanced NSCLC.Cancers · 2026Article
- Structure, mechanism and clinical relevance of NRG1 fusions in cancer.Journal of biomedical science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
NRG1 fusions are oncogenic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with therapeutic relevance highlighted by the FDA's designation of Zenocutuzumab for NRG1 fusion-positive cases. However, the molecular and clinical features of different NRG1 fusion types remain unclear. We retrospectively analyzed 435 NSCLC patients (78 NRG1 fusion-positive, 357 wild-type) from June 2016 to December 2023, using broad-panel DNA/RNA sequencing to assess mutational profiles, tumor mutation burden (TMB), chromosomal instability scores (CIS), and gene expression. Survival analyses were conducted in our cohort (N = 47) and the TCGA dataset (N = 526). Among NRG1-positive patients, 65.8% harbored recurrent fusion partners (e.g., CD74-NRG1, SLC3A2-NRG1), with CD74-NRG1 most frequent (48.1%). These patients showed fewer EGFR/KRAS mutations and lower TMB and CIS compared to wild-type cases (P < 0.01). The remaining 26 patients had unique singleton fusion partners, including 23 novel events such as CEBPD-NRG1 and BMP1-NRG1. This group exhibited significant enrichment of mutations in genes linked to DNA repair and oncogenic pathways (KRAS, MSH2, FANCI, etc.), affecting Fanconi anemia, mismatch repair, PI3K-AKT, and MAPK pathways (P < 0.01). RNA profiling revealed upregulation of DNAJB1 (P < 0.01) and LMNA (P = 0.02) in the singleton group, both associated with worse overall survival in TCGA (HR = 1.52). No significant difference in progression-free survival was seen following first-line EGFR TKI therapy between uncommon and wild-type groups. Our findings highlight the heterogeneity of NRG1 fusions in NSCLC, revealing novel fusions, unique pathway enrichments, and expression profiles that may inform future personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.