Evidence mapPaperPMID 41557173Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

What works to engage cancer patients with fatigue in exercise: a scoping review of RCT-based interventions.

Nathalie André, Amélie Rébillard, Adriano Lertora, Magda Saada-Weisz, Steven Gastinger

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nathalie AndréResearch Centre On Cognition and Learning (UMR CNRS 7295), Sport Sciences Faculty, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France. nathalie.andre@univ-poitiers.fr.
Amélie RébillardUniversity of Rennes, M2S-EA7470, Rennes, France.
Adriano LertoraUniversity of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Magda Saada-WeiszUniversity of Rennes, M2S-EA7470, Rennes, France.
Steven GastingerUniversity of Rennes, M2S-EA7470, Rennes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This scoping review examines the implementation of exercise interventions aimed at reducing fatigue in patients with cancer. Effective programs typically involve moderate-intensity aerobic or combined aerobic and resistance exercises, performed about 30 min per session, three to five times weekly over 12 weeks. Above these FITT-based parameters, it has been found that exercise effectiveness depends on treatment context, patients' characteristics, and the alignment between program demands and individuals' capacity. The review identifies three key issues: current programs emphasize physical training over holistic rehabilitation, often neglecting patients' broader functional needs; process evaluations of interventions are insufficient, limiting understanding of how and why programs succeed or fail; and methodological weaknesses, including inadequate measures of adherence and a lack of theoretical frameworks, reduce the reliability and generalizability of findings. To enhance exercise effectiveness for fatigue, future interventions should adopt patient-centered, theory-driven approaches that integrate both outcome and process evaluations, addressing physical, emotional, and social dimensions to support long-term engagement and improve quality of life.

Indexed as

ExerciseExercise TherapyFatigueNeoplasmsHumansQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResistance TrainingAdherence/complianceBehavioral change techniquesExercise interventionFatigue

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.