ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2026
Identifying Two Autism Biotypes Using Multi-Task Learning Derived Individual-Specific Functional Connectivity.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAutism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a complex neurodevelopmental condition with considerable heterogeneity in clinical symptoms and underlying neurobiological mechanisms. This study aims to identify distinct ASD biotypes by leveraging healthy control (HC) information to extract individual-specific functional connectivity (ISFC) of ASD patients for clustering.
methodsThe study included resting-state fMRI data from 299 male ASD patients and 243 male healthy controls (HCs). We employed multitask learning–based sparse convex alternating structure optimization to extract group-shared and individual-specific connectivity patterns, followed by clustering analysis based on ASD patients’ ISFC features. Subsequently, we compared clinical symptoms, functional connectivity differences across different biological subtypes, and the association between symptoms and brain networks, while evaluating the predictive power of connectivity features for symptoms.
resultsTwo ASD biotypes emerged with distinct connectivity and behavioral characteristics. Biotype1 showed more severe clinical symptoms and a brain network organization marked by stronger global integration but weaker local segregation, reflected in higher global efficiency and reduced clustering, alongside diminished connectivity in core networks such as the default mode network (DMN). Connectivity outside the frontoparietal network (FPN) was positively associated with communication impairments. Biotype2 showed the opposite pattern—greater local differentiation and reduced global integration—with frontoparietal and FPN–DMN connectivity linked to communication, social, and overall symptom severity. Predictive analyses indicated that different connectivity features were most informative for each biotype.
conclusionThis study preliminarily suggests that ISFC may deepen our understanding of ASD heterogeneity and its underlying neurobiological mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41557256What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.