Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41557485›Full record

ArticleApplied psychology. Health and well-being2026

Cooking for others is food for the soul: Consistent momentary, but mixed trait-level well-being benefits for home cooks.

Bryant P H Hui, Linting Zhang, Jacky C K Ng, Johnny C Y Lam, Edmond P H Choi, Ray Y H Cheung, Anise M S Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bryant P H HuiDepartment of Applied Social Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3063-9297
Linting ZhangDepartment of Applied Social Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Jacky C K NgDepartment of Applied Social Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Johnny C Y LamDepartment of Applied Social Sciences, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Edmond P H ChoiSchool of Nursing, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Ray Y H CheungDepartment of Psychology, Lingnan University, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Anise M S WuDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Macau, Macao SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8174-6581

Funding

Department of Applied Social Sciences Internal Research Fund, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University P0036445General Research Fund 2020/2021 of the Research Grants Council, Hong Kong SAR 17608420Mental Health Research Center, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University P0048889
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prosocial behavior can promote well-being, yet the effects of everyday acts-such as cooking for others-remain understudied. Across four studies (N > 1,500), we developed and validated a Prosocial Cooking Scale and examined its well-being effects using cross-sectional surveys and ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Cross-sectional analyses linked prosocial cooking to greater positive affect-but also higher negative affect-at the between-person level. EMA studies revealed within-person benefits: Individuals reported increased positive affect and subjective happiness-and, in our larger community-based sample, higher self-esteem, vitality, and lower negative affect-during prosocial cooking episodes. However, trait-level associations were modest and inconsistent, emerging most reliably for positive affect. Notably, benefits-including positive affect and self-esteem-were strongest for introverts, supporting a person-activity fit perspective. These findings highlight prosocial cooking as an accessible act conferring well-being gains, and illustrate how EMA captures the impact of kindness in everyday life.

Indexed as

AffectCookingPsychological Well-BeingSelf ConceptSocial BehaviorAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHappinessHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultecological momentary assessmentprosocial cookingprosocialitywell‐being

Identifiers

PMID41557485
PMCPMC12818385

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.