Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41557618›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Protocol of the digital long COVID study: A single-center, registry-based, feasibility and clinical evaluation study to investigate a 12-week digital intervention program for people affected by post-COVID-19 condition.

Stefan Rohner, Rebekka Schnepper, Andrea Meienberg, Katrin Bopp, Michael Mayr, Gunther Meinlschmidt, Rainer Schaefert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. SARS-CoV-2 and reproductive system: a scientometric study.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stefan RohnerFaculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4812-6433
Rebekka SchnepperDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5415-5943
Andrea MeienbergFaculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Katrin BoppFaculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Michael MayrFaculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Gunther MeinlschmidtFaculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Rainer SchaefertFaculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Up to 400 million individuals globally are estimated to experience persistent symptoms, including fatigue, muscle pain, and brain fog, following severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 infection. These persistent symptoms are referred to as Post-COVID-19 condition if they last for more than 12 weeks after infection and persist for at least 8 weeks and often causing significant distress and burden. The underlying pathological mechanisms have not yet been fully elucidated. Due to the heterogeneity of the disease a multifactorial origin is highly likely. Overall, evidence on optimal management is limited, and no medication has yet proven to be effective. Current symptom management and treatment guidelines suggest a biopsychosocial perspective and emphasize multidisciplinary approaches. Comprehensive interventions, adequate treatment access, and appropriate resources remain insufficiently available and implementing digital interventions might help mitigate these limitations. This protocol details a single-site feasibility and clinical evaluation study aiming to bridge this gap. By implementing an exploratory, open-label, digital interventional approach this study investigates the feasibility and efficacy of a 12-week program delivered by a cloud-based application. The program consists of 13 modules encompassing a wide range of topics (e.g., energy management, self-care, stress management) and includes informational (e.g., psychoeducational content) and interactive (e.g., exercises, self-reflection diaries) components. Customization options align the material with participant needs. A dedicated feedback section in each module captures feedback regarding usability and feasibility. Participants are monitored and checked for adherence throughout the study. The primary outcome is the post-intervention change in functional capacity measured by the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. All participants provide written informed consent. Key results from the study will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

Indexed as

COVID-19Digital HealthFeasibility StudiesHumansPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeRegistriesSARS-CoV-2Telemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41557618
PMCPMC12818690

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.