ArticlePloS one2026
Deep learning-based no-reference image quality assessment framework for Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Image Quality Assessment (IQA) plays a critical role in image-based decision-making systems, especially in domains requiring high diagnostic precision. Effective feature information is a prerequisite for the high performance of machine learning methods in parasitic organism detection, and the quality of this feature information is influenced by the quality of the images. However, No-Reference IQA (NR-IQA) models have ignored microscopy-based datasets, particularly those involving parasitic organisms such as Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp., which are vital for public health inspection. In this study, PRIQA (Parasite ResNet-101 IQA), a novel deep learning-based NR-IQA model specifically trained on a small parasite image dataset was presented. Using Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) from twenty human evaluators, nine Deep Convolutional Neural Network (DCNN) architectures were benchmarked and identified ResNet-101 as the most robust feature extractor. The features were mapped to MOS using regression models and compared with ten state-of-the-art NR-IQA algorithms. Experimental results demonstrated that PRIQA consistently outperforms existing methods, indicating its suitability as a practical quality control tool for identifying unreliable or low-quality parasite microscopy images and supporting more consistent downstream detection and diagnostic workflows in automated inspection systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.