Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41558861›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2026

Beyond mammals: the evolution of chewing and other forms of oropharyngeal food processing in vertebrates.

Daniel Schwarz, Maja Mielke, Stephan Handschuh, Anthony Herrel, Patrick Lemell, Léa Da Cunha, Nicolai Konow

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Feeding biomechanics in vertebrates and beyond.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel SchwarzDepartment of Palaeontology, State Museum of Natural History Stuttgart (SMNS), Rosenstein 1, Stuttgart, 70191, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5845-4027
Maja MielkeLaboratory of Functional Morphology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, 2610, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6328-0589
Stephan HandschuhVetCore Facility for Research/Imaging Unit, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, Vienna, 1210, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2140-7892
Anthony HerrelDépartement Adaptations du Vivant, UMR 7179 C.N.R.S/M.N.H.N, Bâtiment d'Anatomie Comparée, 55 rue Buffon, Paris, 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0991-4434
Patrick LemellDepartment of Evolutionary Biology, Unit for Integrative Zoology, University of Vienna, Djerassiplatz 1, Vienna, 1030, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0262-4047
Léa Da CunhaInstitut des Sciences de l'Évolution de Montpellier, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, c. c. 64, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0009-0000-6479-8419
Nicolai KonowDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 198 Riverside Street, Lowell, MA, 01854, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3310-9080

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 468618938Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 508778113-[FOR 5581]National Science Foundation 2217246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oropharyngeal food processing exhibits a remarkable diversity among vertebrates, reflecting the evolution of specialised 'processing centres' associated with the mandibular, hyoid, and branchial arches. Although studies have detailed various food-processing strategies and mechanisms across vertebrates, a coherent and comprehensive terminology is lacking. Here, we provide a synthesis, including a unified terminology for the intricate complexity of vertebrate oropharyngeal processing. Among gnathostomes, mandibular food processing predominates, ranging from discrete bites to rhythmic, cyclic chewing facilitated by precise tongue mechanics in aquatic and terrestrial environments alike. By contrast, some taxa have abandoned oropharyngeal processing entirely, relying instead on post-oesophageal strategies such as gastric milling and chemical digestion. Interestingly, teleost (bony) fishes illustrate the evolutionary trade-off between increased jaw protrusion for prey capture and reduced mandibular processing capacity. They compensated for this trade-off by developing derived processing behaviours early in their evolutionary development. Through the re-evolution of mandibular chewing, they succeeded in utilising all three known processing centres. Mastication is a specialised, dimensionally complex form of unignathic mandibular chewing (i.e. chewing restricted to the lower jaw) exclusive to mammals. However, our findings demonstrate that dimensionally complex forms of mandibular chewing have arisen independently multiple times and are widespread among gnathostomes. Notably, diverse taxa, including elasmobranch stingrays, Australian lungfish, sirenid salamanders, various songbirds, herbivorous turtles, and the tuatara, exhibit complex jaw movements combining arcuate, longitudinal, and sometimes transverse components enabled by specialised jaw joints, suspensions, and intracranial motions ('cranial kinesis'). From a comparative, functional-morphological perspective, mammalian mastication may best be characterised as dimensionally complex chewing mediated by the secondary or temporomandibular joint. By contrast, analogous dimensionally complex non-mammalian chewing involving motions confined to the primary or quadrate-articular jaw joint qualifies as pseudomastication. Both mastication and pseudomastication resemble functional masticatory behaviours, while those incorporating intracranial motions and movements of the jaw suspension belong to distinct categories. Our anatomical analysis highlights the convergent evolution of dimensionally complex chewing among gnathostomes and emphasises the importance of comprehensive studies on jaw development and function to deepen our understanding of the evolution of oropharyngeal processing.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionMasticationOropharynxVertebratesAnimalsFeeding Behaviorbehaviourchewingfeedingfeeding apparatusform–functionmasticationmorphologyoropharyngeal food processingvertebrate

Identifiers

PMID41558861
PMCPMC13149792

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.