ArticleScientific data2026
Whole-genome resequencing and genetic diversity of five indigenous cattle breeds from China.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
China's abundant indigenous yellow cattle resources are of great significance for studying environmental adaptability evolution, genetic resource conservation, and breeding improvement. The majority of the cattle population consists of indigenous breeds. Understanding the genetic architecture of these cattle breeds is essential for effective management and conservation efforts. In this study, we collected DNA samples from five local cattle breeds (n = 56) and obtained whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data for 10 Jinchuan (JC) yak samples from the NCBI database as the outgroup. Whole-genome resequencing generated approximately 2.3 TB of paired-end data, achieving an average depth of 13X and a depth range of 9.75X to 39.03X across the 66 samples. The sequencing data were pre-processed and mapped to the cattle reference genome (ARS-UCD1.2) with an alignment rate of 99.5%. Finally, the variant calling process produced approximately 31 million high-quality SNPs. These data enhance our understanding of cattle genetic architecture, enabling the discovery of functional variants and evolutionary insights to inform breeding strategies for climate-resilient and sustainable cattle production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.