ReviewJournal of neurology2026
Imaging and fluid biomarkers for prognostic stratification in cerebral amyloid angiopathy.
Review in Journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is a common small vessel disease characterized by Aβ deposition in cortical and leptomeningeal arteries, leading to lobar intracerebral hemorrhage and vascular cognitive impairment. Despite advances in diagnosis, prognosis remains highly heterogeneous, encompassing risks of recurrent hemorrhage and progressive cognitive decline. This review summarizes recent developments in imaging and fluid biomarkers for prognostic stratification in CAA. Imaging markers, including advanced MRI and molecular PET techniques, have evolved from traditional hemorrhagic indicators, such as cerebral micro-bleeds (CMBs) and cortical superficial siderosis (cSS), to non-hemorrhagic including white matter hyper-intensities (WMHs), and enlarged perivascular spaces (ePVS), which sensitively capture microstructural damage after using quantitative measures. Fluid biomarkers provide dynamic insights into vascular and neuronal injury, including altered plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratios, MMPs/TIMPs balance, and elevated neuro-filament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) levels. Integrating these multi-modal indicators may enable individualized prediction of hemorrhagic and cognitive outcomes and inform precision management strategies. Future research should standardize quantification methods and validate multi-modal models across diverse CAA phenotypes to advance toward personalized prognostic frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.