ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Predicting HFA 30-2 Visual Fields with Deep Learning from Multimodal OCT-Fundus Feature Fusion and Structure-Function Discordance Analysis.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Deep Learning for Humphrey 24-2 Visual Field Prediction: Evaluating the Contribution of Fellow-Eye Information in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Point-to-Point Macular Structure-Function Relationships in Healthy and Glaucomatous Eyes Using OCT and Microperimetry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glaucoma is a leading cause of irreversible vision loss. During clinical follow-up, visual field (VF) tests (Humphrey Field Analyzer 30-2) assesses functional loss, while optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fundus imaging provide structural information. However, VF measurement can be subjective, exhibit test-retest variability, and sometimes exhibit structure-function discordance (SFD). Therefore, predicting VF values from structural images may support clinical decision-making. To estimate Humphrey 30-2 measures (mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and point-wise threshold sensitivity (TS)) in glaucoma/ocular hypertension (OHT) using a ViT-B/32-based feature-fusion approach on OCT and fundus images, and to examine the effect of SFD via sensitivity analysis. Visual features were extracted from color optic disc photographs, red-free fundus images, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness map, and circular RNFL plots using Vision Transformer (ViT-B/32)-based models. These features were combined with demographic and clinical data to form a multimodal artificial intelligence model. Global VF indices (MD, PSD) were estimated with probabilistic regression that accounts for uncertainty, and point-wise TS values were predicted using a location-aware network. In a separate analysis, eyes exhibiting SFD were identified and excluded to assess model performance under OCT-VF concordance. Mean absolute errors (MAE) were 2.26, 1.42, and 2.96 dB for MD, PSD, and mean TS, respectively, and the proportions within ± 2 dB were 59.65%, 75.44%, and 57.90%. After excluding SFD eyes, MAEs decreased to 1.82, 1.30, and 2.12 dB for MD, PSD, and mean TS, respectively; the proportions within ± 2 dB increased to 66.7%, 76.5% and 62.7%, respectively. These findings indicate that discordance affects performance and that predictions are more reliable in clinically concordant cases. ViT-B/32-based deep feature fusion offers clinically meaningful accuracy for predicting VF metrics from multimodal structural images. SFD was frequently detected among the lowest-performing cases, and this possibility should be considered when interpreting low-performing outputs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41559508What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.