Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41559730›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2026

Moving together to facilitate equity and inclusion in research. The co-production of interventions for clinical trials to facilitate participation of people from ethnically diverse communities.

Emily R Ramage, Hannah Sharma, Frances Batchelor, Erin Bicknell, Lyn Bongiovanni, Bianca Brijnath, Priyanka Cahill, Michele Callisaya, Agnieszka Chudecka, Rosa Cursio-Barcham and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Beyond the horizon: new directions in research coproduction.Health research policy and systems · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Emily R RamagePhysiotherapy, Western Health, St Albans, Australia. emily.ramage@florey.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0599-7028
Hannah SharmaPhysiotherapy, Western Health, St Albans, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4365-6981
Frances BatchelorThe University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Erin BicknellPhysiotherapy Department, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8057-8712
Lyn BongiovanniLanguage Services, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Bianca BrijnathSchool of Humanities and Social Sciences, La Trobe, Melbourne, Australia.
Priyanka CahillPhysiotherapy, Western Health, St Albans, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9124-3623
Michele CallisayaMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2122-1622
Agnieszka ChudeckaPICAC Alliance Secretariat Lead, PICAC SA, Multicultural Aged Care SA Inc., Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7857-5986
Rosa Cursio-BarchamConsumer Partner, Melbourne, Australia.
Lidia EngelMonash University Health Economics Group, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Marlena KlaicThe University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Eleanor LamConsumer Partner, Melbourne, Australia.
Wen Kwang LimThe University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Cassie E McDonaldDepartment of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9518-5869
Marina B PinheiroInstitute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Heath District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7459-5105
Catherine SherringtonInstitute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Heath District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8934-4368
Sara VogrinDepartment of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1597-9421
Jesse ZankerThe University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3463-6827
Cheng ZhengConsumer Partner, Melbourne, Australia.
Catherine M SaidPhysiotherapy, Western Health, St Albans, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8773-9750
MOVE Together Collaboration

Funding

Medical Research Future Fund MRF2015963
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople from ethnically diverse backgrounds are underrepresented in clinical trials, reinforcing healthcare inequity. Co-production involves users of research (knowledge users) as partners in the research process. A premise of co-production is that it enhances ethicality of research by responding to the needs and preferences of those it is designed for while facilitating adoption and impact. Research reporting co-production in ethnically diverse communities is emerging; however, reporting of specific strategies to support effective co-production remains sparse, particularly when designing interventions for clinical trials. We draw on our experience of co-production with ethnically diverse communities to address this gap in the research literature using the exemplar, MOVE Together: Reduce falls, a co-produced intervention to support people aged over 65 years from ethnically diverse communities to develop exercise habits and reduce their risk of falls.

methodsUtilizing an integrated knowledge translation (IKT) approach to co-production, our team of 24 partners, including people aged over 65 years from ethnically diverse communities, representatives from ethnically diverse community groups and service providers developed our intervention over five stages. Two stages engaged 75 participants including 63 (84%) people aged over 65 years from three ethnically diverse communities (Chinese, Italian and Arabic-speaking) and 12 service providers. The remaining three stages involved the co-production research team.

resultsStrong participant satisfaction (96%) and co-production team consensus regarding the readiness of our intervention for progression to clinical trial (100%) support the success of our approach. Strategies to optimize communication and uphold the principles of co-production were identified by our team as important to the process. Drawing on research evidence and our experience we highlight potential strategies to support alignment with the principles of co-production when co-producing with people from ethnically diverse communities. These include additional time and financial resources, tailored approaches to information provision and a culturally responsive approach.

conclusionsWhen co-producing interventions for clinical trials with ethnically diverse communities, co-production teams must be prepared for the additional resources necessary to ensure genuine partnership. In this exemplar, we describe an iterative approach to health research co-production that may inform future health research involving under-served populations.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCultural DiversityEthnicityHealth EquityPatient ParticipationPatient SelectionAccidental FallsAgedCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchExerciseFemaleHumansMaleTranslational Research, BiomedicalCodesignCollaborative researchCoproductionCulturally and linguistically diverseEthnically diverseIntegrated knowledge translation

Identifiers

PMID41559730
PMCPMC12821870

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.