Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41559782›Full record

ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2026

Health technology assessment in Ghana: the development of the process guidelines using evidence-informed deliberative processes.

Gavin Surgey, Brian Adu Asare, Rob Baltussen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gavin SurgeyRadboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands. gavin.surgey@radboudumc.nl.
Brian Adu AsareDirectorate of Pharmacy, Ministry of Health, Accra, Ghana.
Rob BaltussenRadboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth technology assessment (HTA) is increasingly recognised as a critical tool for advancing universal health coverage in Ghana. Despite national health policies emphasising the importance of HTA, the country has historically lacked a formal framework and clear process guidelines to incorporate HTA systematically into healthcare decision-making.

methodsThe development of Ghana’s HTA process guidelines began in 2019. It was finalised in December 2022, based on the concept of evidence-informed deliberative processes and best practices from functional HTA frameworks in other countries. Key activities involved creating a governance structure, defining decision criteria, and establishing an eight-step HTA process. Capacity-strengthening activities enabled the Technical Working Group (TWG) to participate in developing the guidelines and ensured buy-in at all levels.

resultsThe resulting process guidelines outline an eight-step framework that provides clear guidance for each stage: topic nomination, selection and approval, scoping and stakeholder engagement, assessment, appraisal, deliberations and recommendations, communication, and implementation. Surveys conducted during the development phase revealed high levels of satisfaction, indicating the enhanced legitimacy of healthcare decisions under the new framework. The guidelines establish a transparent, inclusive, and evidence-informed HTA process in Ghana.

conclusionAdopting formal HTA process guidelines marks a significant step toward strengthening healthcare decision-making in Ghana, aligning with the nation’s universal health coverage goals. By institutionalising HTA within a transparent and participatory framework, Ghana is better positioned to prioritise and allocate healthcare resources effectively, promoting efficiency, equity and sustainability in its health system.

Indexed as

Decision makingEDPsEvidence-informed deliberative processGhanaHealth technology assessmentHTA

Identifiers

PMID41559782
PMCPMC12964789

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.