ArticleGenome biology2026
Blood-based DNA methylation captures variance in adult height.
Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile height is a highly heritable trait with strong polygenic prediction, previous studies have postulated that minimal variation of its individual differences can be captured by DNA methylation (DNAm). We investigated the role of blood-based genome-wide DNAm in capturing the variance in adult height in a large population-based cohort of 7,654 unrelated individuals from Generation Scotland using DNAm profiled on the Illumina EPIC array. The posterior DNAm probe effects were used to construct a DNAm profile score (Methylation Profile Score-MPS) which was evaluated in three independent cohorts.
resultsGenome-wide DNAm captures 25.0% (95% credible interval (CrI) 17.2-31.9) of the phenotypic variation in height when applying Bayesian penalised regression using BayesR + conditional on genetic effects. The total variation captured jointly by DNAm and genetic effects (80.3%, 95% CrI 70.1-87.2) is larger than the marginal estimate based on genetic effects only (56.3%, 95% CrI 45.8-66.8). Out-of-sample prediction shows that the MPS is weakly correlated with measured height (Pearson correlation ranging from 0.14-0.26), as well as being associated with several health and lifestyle factors in the LBC1936 that are established correlates of height.
conclusionWith the advent of larger sample sizes in epigenomics anticipated to improve the power to detect associations between DNAm and complex traits, we urge caution when making assumptions around "null traits" based solely on methylome-wide association study results and encourage the use of whole-genome methods to assess the proportion of variation in a trait that may be captured by DNAm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.