ArticleMedicine2026
Interpretable machine learning for coronary heart disease risk stratification in patients with carotid atherosclerosis: A retrospective cross-sectional study.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model for risk stratification of coronary heart disease (CHD) in patients with carotid atherosclerosis, with CHD presence/absence defined as the target outcome variable. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 442 patients diagnosed with carotid atherosclerosis at a tertiary hospital in China between January 1, 2022, and June 20, 2025. Patients were divided into CHD and non-CHD groups based on clinical outcomes. Data encompassing demographics, laboratory results, and vascular imaging findings were collected. Feature selection involved logistic regression (LR), identifying 5 key predictors: age, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and the presence of carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Seven machine learning algorithms (LR, XGBoost, LightGBM, random forest, K-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, and stacking ensemble) were trained and evaluated. Model performance was assessed using 10-fold cross-validation, with metrics including area under the curve, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score. Model interpretability was evaluated using Shapley Additive Explanations, while clinical utility was determined through calibration and decision curve analysis. All models demonstrated satisfactory performance, with the LR model achieving the highest area under the curve of 0.838 on the testing set, indicating balanced sensitivity and specificity. Shapley Additive Explanations analysis identified carotid plaque and TIA as the most influential predictors. Calibration and decision curve analysis curves indicated strong agreement between predicted and observed risks, leading to a significant clinical net benefit. An interpretable LR model incorporating age, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, TIA, and carotid plaque enables reliable CHD risk stratification among patients with carotid atherosclerosis. This model serves as a practical, explainable tool for individualized risk assessment and early clinical decision support in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.