ArticleYonsei medical journal2026
Steatosis-Associated Fibrosis Estimator Score in Asian Patients with Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.
Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRecently, the steatosis-associated fibrosis estimator (SAFE) score was developed to predict significant fibrosis in primary care. We externally validated the SAFE score in Asian patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe validated the SAFE score in 6229 patients who underwent transient elastography (TE) from 2012 to 2022. The sensitivities, specificities, negative predictive values, and positive predictive values of SAFE scores (two cutoffs: <0 and ≥100) for predicting fibrosis stage ≥2 were calculated.
resultsBased on TE results, the SAFE score had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.753 (95% confidence interval 0.737-0.769), outperforming the Fibrosis-4 index (0.672) and the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (0.663). Non-obese and obese patients had similar sensitivities (77.0% vs. 78.4%) and specificities (61.5% vs. 51.8%) for SAFE score <0, and similar sensitivities (50.0% vs. 50.0%) and specificities (90.1% vs. 85.4%) for SAFE score ≥100. Sensitivity of the SAFE score for ≥100 increased with age, from 16.1% (age 19-30) to 79.7% (age ≥61), whereas specificity for ≥100 decreased.
conclusionWe externally validated the good performance of the SAFE score in Asian patients. The SAFE score has potential as an initial assessment to identify a low-risk population in a primary care setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.