Evidence mapPaperPMID 41560463Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

Involving Societal Stakeholders in Dementia Risk Reduction: An Explorative Study.

Jolanda H M Dobbe, Ellen M A Smets, Esmee Kreuk, Simone Coppelmans, Lars Ramaker, Moniek Schröder, Diny E Stekelenburg, Wiebe de Vries, W M Monique Verschuren, Kay Deckers and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. From mapping evidence to engaging voices: Paving the way for research on the social determinants of dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Involving Societal Stakeholders in Dementia Risk Reduction: An Explorative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jolanda H M DobbeMedical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0000-6966-1999
Ellen M A SmetsMedical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Esmee KreukMedical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Simone CoppelmansIndependent Public Partner, the Netherlands.
Lars RamakerIndependent Public Partner, the Netherlands.
Moniek SchröderIndependent Public Partner, the Netherlands.
Diny E StekelenburgIndependent Public Partner, the Netherlands.
Wiebe de VriesIndependent Public Partner, the Netherlands.
W M Monique VerschurenCenter for Prevention, Lifestyle and Health, National Institute for Public Health and Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Kay DeckersAlzheimer Centre Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neuroscience Research Institute (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1339-2974
Frank J WoltersDepartments of Epidemiology and Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Leonie N C VisserMedical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 1051003210005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOptimal dementia risk reduction requires a combination of individual- and population-level approaches. Societal stakeholders play a crucial role by raising awareness, supporting individual lifestyle change, and/or influencing certain risk factors through policy changes. This study aimed to identify relevant societal stakeholders for promoting dementia risk reduction, and explore perspectives regarding their role.

methodsWe used a qualitative approach with participatory research elements (i.e., collaborating with stakeholders in the research). An advisory panel of citizens (n = 14) was installed to provide input on various study aspects (e.g., study design and interpretation of findings). Thereafter, data collection involved two phases: 1) identification of potentially relevant societal stakeholders (based on advisory panel discussions, a conference workshop, and online searches); and 2) exploration of perspectives of participants from selected stakeholder domains, through 18 interviews and one focus group (total N = 32). We analysed data using thematic analysis.

resultsPhase 2 revealed that participants, such as religious leaders, labour service employees and board members of student associations, had limited knowledge and experienced little responsibility to act as a societal stakeholder in the context of dementia risk reduction. Rather, they called for policy and regulations to make dementia risk reduction efforts obligatory and a public priority. Participants recommended incorporating information on dementia and dementia risk in general health campaigns, rather than organising dementia-specific campaigns, and stressed the need to stimulate dementia risk reduction early in life.

conclusionsEffective dementia risk reduction could benefit from increased stakeholder involvement, as well as imposed policy-level risk reduction measures. Our findings also highlight the importance of including dementia in education and healthy lifestyle programmes from an early age. Future studies are needed to validate our findings on a larger scale, and among different stakeholders. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Citizens were involved in study conceptualisation and design, and in the interpretation, reporting and dissemination of findings.

Indexed as

DementiaRisk Reduction BehaviorStakeholder ParticipationAdultAgedCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchRisk Factorsdementiaparticipatory researchpopulation‐level approachesrisk reductionsocietal stakeholders

Identifiers

PMID41560463
PMCPMC12820418

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.