ReviewmAbs2026
Antibodies to watch in 2026.
Review in mAbs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Emerging organoids and organoids-on-chip platforms for translational development of antibody‒drug conjugates and next-generation bioconjugates.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- The Reality of Active Targeting in Nanomedicine: Promise Versus Performance.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026Review
- Advances in Downstream Processing of Monoclonal Antibodies.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Structure and function of therapeutic antibodies approved by the US FDA in 2025.Antibody therapeutics · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Atomic-Resolution NMR Investigations of Monoclonal Antibodies.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Host cell protein impurities in therapeutic proteins: overview of advances in detection, nonconventional removal technologies and immunogenicity assessment.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Targeting of VEGFR-2, PD-L1, and EGFR-MET Pathways in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Clinical Progress with Ramucirumab, Atezolizumab, and Amivantamab.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies for diabetic kidney disease: a narrative review from basic mechanisms to clinical evidence.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Antibodies to Watch article series provides annual updates on commercial late-stage clinical development, regulatory review, and marketing approvals of antibody therapeutics. Since the first article was published in 2010, the late-stage pipeline has grown from 26 antibody therapeutics to over 200, while during the same time numerous molecules in late-stage studies either transitioned to regulatory review and were approved or were terminated. In this installment of the series, we recap first marketing approvals granted to 19 antibody therapeutics in 2025, discuss 26 molecules currently in regulatory review, including the bispecific antibody-drug conjugate izalontamab brengitecan, and predict which molecules of the 209 currently in the commercial late-stage pipeline might transition to regulatory review by the end of 2026. Most antibody therapeutics in the latter category are for non-cancer indications (16/21, 76%) and have a conventional format (13/21, 62%), but the category also includes numerous antibody-oligo or -drug conjugates, such as delpacibart etedesiran, delpacibart zotadirsen, zeleciment rostudirsen, sonesitatug vedotin, trastuzumab pamirtecan, and ifinatamab deruxtecan, as well as the bispecific petosemtamab. As antibody therapeutics development is a global enterprise, we also discuss trends in annual first approvals granted to antibody therapeutics in any country since 2010, stratified by the antibody's country of origin, documenting the notable increases in the total number of first approvals and those approved first in China. Finally, to benchmark the time typically required for clinical development and regulatory review, we calculated this period for recently approved antibody therapeutic products stratified by their therapeutic area, mechanism of action, format, and country of origin. Our data show that the development and approval period were typically ~6 years, but on average this period was shorter for China-originated products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.