Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41560619›Full record

ReviewmAbs2026

Antibodies to watch in 2026.

Silvia Crescioli, Hélène Kaplon, Alicia Chenoweth, Yu-Shin Hsu, Kieran Pinto, Vaishali Kapoor, Janice M Reichert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mAbs, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. NAR cancer · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. The Reality of Active Targeting in Nanomedicine: Promise Versus Performance.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Silvia CrescioliIndependent Consultant, Business Intelligence, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1909-5957
Hélène KaplonInstitut Servier d'Innovation Therapeutique, Therapeutic Area Oncology, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5597-2195
Alicia ChenowethKing's College London, St. John's Institute of Dermatology, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2736-9268
Yu-Shin HsuBeacon Intelligence, Hanson Wade Group, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0005-9288-971X
Kieran PintoCambridge Healthcare Research, Strategic CI Division, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0009-0000-4740-7666
Vaishali KapoorDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7581-1487
Janice M ReichertReichert Biotechnology Consulting, Business Intelligence, Framingham, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0400-1951

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Antibodies to Watch article series provides annual updates on commercial late-stage clinical development, regulatory review, and marketing approvals of antibody therapeutics. Since the first article was published in 2010, the late-stage pipeline has grown from 26 antibody therapeutics to over 200, while during the same time numerous molecules in late-stage studies either transitioned to regulatory review and were approved or were terminated. In this installment of the series, we recap first marketing approvals granted to 19 antibody therapeutics in 2025, discuss 26 molecules currently in regulatory review, including the bispecific antibody-drug conjugate izalontamab brengitecan, and predict which molecules of the 209 currently in the commercial late-stage pipeline might transition to regulatory review by the end of 2026. Most antibody therapeutics in the latter category are for non-cancer indications (16/21, 76%) and have a conventional format (13/21, 62%), but the category also includes numerous antibody-oligo or -drug conjugates, such as delpacibart etedesiran, delpacibart zotadirsen, zeleciment rostudirsen, sonesitatug vedotin, trastuzumab pamirtecan, and ifinatamab deruxtecan, as well as the bispecific petosemtamab. As antibody therapeutics development is a global enterprise, we also discuss trends in annual first approvals granted to antibody therapeutics in any country since 2010, stratified by the antibody's country of origin, documenting the notable increases in the total number of first approvals and those approved first in China. Finally, to benchmark the time typically required for clinical development and regulatory review, we calculated this period for recently approved antibody therapeutic products stratified by their therapeutic area, mechanism of action, format, and country of origin. Our data show that the development and approval period were typically ~6 years, but on average this period was shorter for China-originated products.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalDrug ApprovalAnimalsAntibodies, BispecificDrug DevelopmentHumansImmunoconjugatesAntibodies, BispecificAntibodies, MonoclonalImmunoconjugatesantibody-drug conjugateAntibody therapeuticbispecificcancerEuropean Medicines AgencyFood and Drug Administrationimmune-mediated disordersmultispecificNational Medical Products Administration

Identifiers

PMID41560619
PMCPMC12826703

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.