ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Randomized trial and multi-omics, machine learning-based mechanistic exploration of daixie decoction granules in type 2 diabetes.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) offers multi-target strategies for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), but its mechanisms are unclear. This study combined a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a multi-omics approach to evaluate the efficacy of Daixie Decoction granules (DDG) as an add-on therapy to metformin and to generate mechanistic hypotheses using a multi-omics framework. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 136 randomized and 128 completed with DDG plus metformin or placebo plus metformin for 6 months. Mechanistic prediction was based on network pharmacology, integration of T2DM-related genes from public databases (GeneCards, DisGeNET, OMIM), and transcriptomic differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from GEO. Seven machine learning algorithms were applied to prioritize core targets from the overlapping candidate list. A nested serum proteomics sub-study within the randomized trial, with tissue-specific expression profiling (GTEx), was then used to explore the consistency of these computational predictions at the protein and tissue levels. Statistical analysis was performed using appropriate parametric and nonparametric tests, including ANCOVA where applicable. Results: DDG reduced HbA1c compared with placebo (-0.32%, P=0.032). Fasting plasma glucose showed a borderline reduction (P=0.050). Network pharmacology identified 617 potential targets intersecting with 2,652 DEGs, yielding 29 candidates. Using machine-learning combined with protein-protein interaction topology and literature support, we further prioritized eight core targets (P2RX7, IL1B, PTPN1, AKT2, CD38, NFE2L2, NOS3, and MERTK). Enrichment analyses of these candidates, together with serum proteomic profiling, implicated PI3K-Akt signaling, inflammatory and oxidative stress responses, and focal adhesion-related pathways. Conclusion: Clinically, DDG used as add-on therapy to metformin produced a modest but statistically significant improvement in glycemic control in patients with inadequately controlled T2DM. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that DDG may act through a multi-target network spanning inflammatory (P2RX7, IL1B), insulin/metabolic (PTPN1, AKT2, CD38), oxidative-endothelial (NFE2L2, NOS3) and vascular-resolution (MERTK) axes, generating testable mechanistic hypotheses for future experimental studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.