Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41560726›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Pharmacovigilance signal detection of psychiatric adverse events induced by third-generation antiepileptic drugs in children.

Wenfang Sun, Yali Li, Binbin Xia, Liushui Li, Jing Chen, Yang Liu, Jingyao Pang, Fang Liu, Hua Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wenfang SunDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yali LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Binbin XiaDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Liushui LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jing ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jingyao PangDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Fang LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hua ChengDepartment of Pharmacy, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The present study was a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis to identify pharmacovigilance signals of psychiatric adverse events (AEs) associated with the clinical use of third-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in children, thereby providing a reference for clinical drug selection and pharmaceutical care. Methods: The data were obtained from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Reports involving patients under 18 years old were retrieved using the generic and brand names of four drugs: lacosamide, perampanel, brivaracetam, and eslicarbazepine. Positive safety signals were detected using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) method and the Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) method for further analysis. The number of AEs ≥3 cases, ROR value 95% confidence interval lower limit >1 and information component 25 (IC025) must be above 0 was considered statistically significant. Results: Lacosamide and eslicarbazepine acetate demonstrated relatively lower signals of psychiatric AEs, while brivaracetam was associated with a certain degree of psychiatric risk. In contrast, perampanel requires heightened clinical vigilance due to its potential to induce severe psychiatric and behavioral abnormalities, particularly aggression, suicidal ideation, and homicidal ideation. The most significant psychiatric safety signals for perampanel, based on ROR, were homicidal ideation (ROR = 23.51 [9.72, 56.89]), aggression (ROR = 17.81 [13.85, 22.92]), and psychotic disorders (ROR = 16.94 [9.57, 29.99]). Conclusion: The findings of this study provide a reference for clinical selection of third-generation AEDs. When initiating treatment in children, clinicians should consider the differential psychiatric risk profiles of these third-generation AEDs, monitor potential psychiatric side effects and adjust prescriptions promptly.

Indexed as

adverse eventantiepileptic drugschildrenFAERS databasepsychiatric

Identifiers

PMID41560726
PMCPMC12812890

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.