ReviewMaterials today. Bio2026
Recent advances in cancer nanomedicine: From smart targeting to personalized therapeutics - pioneering a new era in precision oncology.
Review in Materials today. Bio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Repurposing Non-oncologic Drugs via Targeted Nanocarriers for Cancer Therapy: Mechanisms, Synergistic Combinations, and Clinical Translation.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Review
- Mannosylated graphene oxide nanotherapeutics co-delivering docetaxel and a STING agonist reprogram myeloid cells and potentiate antitumor immunity.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Polymeric Nano Drug Delivery Systems for Overcoming Tumor Microenvironment-Mediated Drug Resistance.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Liposome-Based Photodynamic Therapy for Breast Cancer: Innovations in Targeted Delivery, Combination Strategies, and Clinical Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Nanotechnology in Cancer Therapy: How Nanoparticles Are Shaping the Future of Personalized Treatment.ACS nano medicine · 2026Review
- Advanced nanoplatforms for oxaliplatin-based breast cancer therapy: targeted delivery, stimuli-responsive design, and translational challenges.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Engineered MoSNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Cationic lipid-based nanoparticles for therapeutic delivery in cancer treatment: physicochemical characteristics, therapeutic cargos, and clinical potential.Applied microscopy · 2026Review
- Nanomaterial-Based Therapeutic Delivery: Integrating Redox Biology, Genetic Engineering, and Imaging-Guided Treatment.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Nanoplatforms for Multimodal Imaging and Targeted Cancer Therapy: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advancing Drug Discovery with AI: Machine and Deep Learning Strategies for Target Identification and Precision Nanomedicine.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Evaluation of New Coumarins for Anti-Cancer Activity in HL-60 Cell Line Supported by Molecular Docking, MD Simulation, and Binding Free Energy Calculations.OncoTargets and therapy · 2026Article
- Natural Polymers Based Biocompatible Nanomedicines for Targeting Colon Cancer: Prospects and Challenges.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Fast-Dissolving Sodium Alginate-Based Microneedle Patch Integrating Tranilast and Glabridin-Loaded Nanoparticles for Dual-Action Hypertrophic Scar Therapy.Biomaterials research · 2026Article
- A paradigm shift toward full-cycle management of atrial fibrillation: integrating digital twins and artificial intelligence.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer nanomedicine has evolved from the 1995 landmark approval of Doxil® into a programmable platform of precision oncology. The field now progresses along a coherent continuum that begins with passive enhanced permeability and retention (EPR)-mediated tumor accumulation, advances to active ligand-receptor targeting, and culminates in stimuli-responsive carriers whose cargo is liberated only when triggered by endogenous (acidic pH, redox imbalance, elevated GSH, dysregulated enzymes, ROS) or exogenous (light, magnetic, ultrasound, X-ray, electric) cues intrinsic to the tumor microenvironment (TME). This review maps this continuum, highlighting how the integration of patient-specific multi-omics data with artificial intelligence (AI) is converting tumor heterogeneity into quantitative design rules for nanocarrier optimization, validated in patient-derived organoids. Despite over 15 FDA-approved cancer nanomedicines and a robust clinical pipeline, translation is impeded by biological barriers, protein corona-mediated toxicity, manufacturing scalability issues, and a fragmented regulatory landscape. To bridge this bench-to-bedside chasm, we propose a convergent roadmap: safe-by-design engineering, quality-by-design modular manufacturing, and AI-guided digital twins coupled with micro/nano-robotic delivery for real-time, adaptive dosing. Realizing this vision will transform nanomedicine from an empirical carrier technology into a patient-calibrated, closed-loop therapeutic engine, cementing its role as the frontline of precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.