ArticleThe application of clinical genetics2026
Chorionic Villus Sampling in the Era of Genomic Medicine: A Gateway to Early and Personalized Prenatal Diagnosis.
Article in The application of clinical genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Despite the rapid expansion of noninvasive genomic technologies, invasive procedures such as chorionic villus sampling (CVS) remain indispensable for providing definitive, early prenatal genetic diagnoses. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value and effectiveness of CVS in the early detection of chromosomal and genetic abnormalities in a cohort of 912 Polish women. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 912 CVS procedures performed between 2010 and 2024 at a tertiary referral center. Indications, sampling success rates, and genetic results were analyzed. Fetal samples were examined using conventional karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis, and digital PCR. Results: Of 912 procedures, 903 (99.0%) were technically successful, with 844 included in the final cytogenetic analysis. The most common indication was abnormal ultrasound findings (79.9%). Chromosomal abnormalities were found in 40.05% of cases, with trisomy 21 (16.8%), trisomy 18 (8.8%), trisomy 13 (3.1%) and monosomy X (4.6%) being the most frequent. Mosaicism was detected in 8 cases, and maternal cell contamination in 9. Conclusion: CVS is a valuable method of early prenatal genetic diagnosis, especially in high-risk pregnancies, where early and personalized genomic assessment can have a significant impact on clinical decision-making. Emerging genomic technologies are likely to complement CVS, underscoring its continued relevance in genomic medicine and personalized prenatal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.