ArticleJournal of human reproductive sciences
Advanced Embryo Ploidy Classification Using Vision Transformers: Integration of Sequential Time-Lapse Imaging and Undersampling Techniques: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of human reproductive sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reliable identification of embryo ploidy is essential for optimising outcomes in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Conventional deep learning models, however, are limited by class imbalance, particularly due to the underrepresentation of mosaic embryos. Aim: This study aimed to improve embryo ploidy classification by integrating Vision Transformers (ViTs) with sequential time-lapse imaging and applying random undersampling (RUS) to mitigate data imbalance. Settings and Design: A retrospective study using blastocyst-stage time-lapse imaging data from a fertility clinic. Customised deep learning models were developed to predict embryo ploidy status. Materials and Methods: A total of 1020 blastocyst videos with genetically confirmed ploidy were analysed, generating 99,324 sequential frames representing the final 10 h of development before biopsy. To address imbalance, RUS produced a balanced dataset of 17,000 images per class: Euploid, aneuploid and mosaic. Two ViT architectures (ViT-B/16 and ViT-B/32) were fine-tuned for binary and multiclass tasks. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score on both balanced and imbalanced datasets. Statistical Analysis Used: Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. A 5-fold cross-validation procedure was applied to ensure robustness and reduce variance across data splits. Results: The ViT-B/16 achieved 0.84 accuracy in binary and 0.67 in multiclass classification on the balanced dataset, whereas performance dropped to 0.49 on the imbalanced set. RUS improved the prediction of minority classes, particularly mosaic embryos. Conclusion: Combining ViTs with sequential time-lapse imaging and RUS provides a promising non-invasive approach for embryo ploidy classification, enhancing accuracy for mosaic embryos and supporting more informed embryo selection in ART.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.