ArticleFrontiers in oral health2025
Self-perceived oral health, general self-efficacy, and their relations to oral health conditions in head and neck cancer patients in Sweden-a prospective observational study.
Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore self-perceived oral health and general self-efficacy and relate this to dental plaque, gingival inflammation, and oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients in Sweden, before, during, and three months after treatment. Methods: Registration of clinical variables (dental plaque, gingival inflammation, and oral mucositis) was performed in 75 patients. The patients completed the self-perceived oral health (SPOH), and general self-efficacy (GSE) questionnaires at baseline, week 6 during treatment, and 3 months after treatment. Changes in clinical variables and answers to questionnaires between time-points were analyzed as well as differences between clinical variables and questionnaire data. Results: The majority had low levels of plaque and gingival inflammation at all time-points, and oral mucositis occurred in 82%. Forty-three percent perceived their oral health as good at baseline, and the proportion decreased to 18% at week 6. At baseline, toothbrushing twice a day was reported by 95%, and daily interdental cleaning by 51%. The majority had high self-efficacy at all time-points. No statistically significant differences between self-perceived oral health and clinical variables were found. Conclusion: Despite major challenges during cancer treatment, most patients had good oral hygiene, perceived their oral health as good, and had high self-efficacy. Clinical relevance: This study contributes to increased knowledge about HNC patients' self-perceived oral health and ability to maintain good oral hygiene during cancer treatment. Such knowledge can be used in the development of customized oral care protocols, which in turn may have a positive impact on both oral health and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.