ArticleERJ open research2026
Safety and efficacy of upfront triple therapy including parenteral treprostinil compared to double oral therapy in PAH (TripleTRE): study protocol for a randomised trial.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advanced right ventricular evaluation in pulmonary hypertension: the role of 3D echocardiography and strain analysis.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) requires a complex and multidisciplinary care approach with regular follow-up visits to monitor disease progression and adaptation of treatment regimens. Current ESC/ERS Guidelines recommend initial double oral treatment (endothelin-receptor antagonist + phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor) in patients presenting at diagnosis with intermediate risk according to the three-strata risk score. Retrospective data analyses indicate a clinical benefit for upfront triple combination therapy including parenteral prostacyclins (PCA) in intermediate and high-risk patients. The multicentric TripleTRE trial aims to investigate the effect of initial triple combination therapy including parenteral PCA on risk status, compared to double oral in a prospective setting in patients at intermediate-high risk at diagnosis according to the four-strata risk score. Methods: A phase IV, multicentre, prospective, randomised, two-arm, open-label trial will be conducted. The study will enrol a total of 110 patients with intermediate-high risk of death at PAH diagnosis. Patients are randomised (1:1) to receive either initial double-oral treatment or upfront triple combination treatment including parenteral treprostinil. The primary end-point is the achievement of a low-risk status between week 24 and 48 assessed with the simplified four-strata risk assessment tool. Discussion: Despite retrospective evidence for greater benefit, prospective investigation of upfront triple therapy including a parenteral PCA is lacking. The TripleTRE trial aims to fill this gap and test the hypothesis of "hit hard and early" in patients with newly diagnosed PAH.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.