ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Diuretic resistance in cardiorenal syndrome: mechanisms, monitoring and phenotype-tailored management.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Low serum chloride concentration and the in-hospital mortality of patients with acute decompensated heart failure: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Cardiorenal Syndrome Type 1 in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Device-based therapies in cardio-renal syndrome: a pathophysiology-driven approach to a complex bidirectional disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congestion drives most hospitalizations for acute and chronic heart failure (HF), reflecting the pivotal role of sodium and water retention in disease progression. Loop diuretics remain the first-line decongestive therapy, yet up to one-third of patients exhibit an inadequate natriuretic response-defined as diuretic resistance (DR)-which is strongly associated with prolonged hospitalization, readmissions and adverse outcomes. DR is a multifactorial phenomenon arising from pharmacokinetic limitations, tubular adaptations, neurohormonal activation, and hemodynamic disturbances. Impaired renal perfusion, elevated venous pressures, and chloride depletion are key contributors that mutually reinforce one another and blunt diuretic efficacy. Early recognition through urinary sodium measurement and urine output monitoring is essential to guide therapy before resistance becomes entrenched. Beyond optimizing loop diuretic delivery, management strategies should include sequential nephron blockade, correction of electrolyte and acid-base imbalances and avoidance of excessive sodium restriction. Certain patient phenotypes-right heart failure (RHF), advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), obesity-related HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and frail or elderly patients-pose additional challenges due to overlapping mechanisms of resistance and increased treatment vulnerability. Each requires a tailored approach that balances decongestion with preservation of renal function and systemic perfusion. In refractory cases, extracorporeal fluid removal or peritoneal dialysis may be necessary, while newer pharmacologic agents-such as sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists GLP-1 RAs)-offer complementary benefits. This review synthesizes mechanistic insights, bedside monitoring tools and phenotype-specific strategies for the management of DR in cardiorenal syndrome (CRS).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.