ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Autonomic and baroreflex regulations in syndromic and non-syndromic aortopathies: a case-control study.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Baroreflex regulation is directly influenced by the mechano-sensitive properties of the baroreceptors. The mechanical and dimensional properties of the aorta are affected in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA). We hypothesize that the baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) is modified in TAA patients and that these modifications might be different when the TAA group is divided into syndromic (Synd) and non-syndromic (NonSynd) patients. The aim of the study is to evaluate autonomic and baroreflex control in patients with Synd and NonSynd TAAs. We enrolled 80 TAA patients and divided them into Synd (N = 46) and NonSynd (N = 34) groups. The two groups did not differ in either demographic factors or pharmacological therapy. Autonomic function and BRS, assessed from the heart period (HP) and systolic arterial pressure (SAP) variability, were compared to those of age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HCs, N = 28). Analyses were carried out in the low-frequency (LF, 0.04 Hz-0.15 Hz) and high-frequency (HF, 0.15 Hz-0.4 Hz) bands. The Synd and NonSynd subgroups did not show any significant differences in terms of autonomic control or BRS. We observed that, in the LF band, BRS was lower in TAA patients than in HCs during rest in the supine position (REST), while it was similar during active standing (STAND). STAND reduced the power of HP variability in the HF band and BRS in the LF band while increasing the power of SAP in the LF band in both HCs and TAA patients. Since BRS was lower at REST in both Synd and NonSynd TAA groups than in the HC group, we conclude that BRS is affected by either the dimensional or the mechanical properties of the aorta in relation to the pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.